Posts: 543
Threads: 5
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation:
0
09-09-2010, 10:30 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-09-2010, 10:31 PM by radioholic.)
They did a telephone current affair (i think it was )
they said over 20,000 calls and 88% said "yes we should have another election."
so what does everyone on here think yes or no to another
election?
Posts: 1,924
Threads: 12
Joined: Feb 2009
Reputation:
0
We have already voted and a point was made. No, to another election. Three years is not long between elections.
Posts: 9,473
Threads: 787
Joined: Sep 2006
Reputation:
0
10-09-2010, 06:30 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-09-2010, 06:31 PM by glen.)
Yeah 3 years is not long. Then again, you can do quite a bit of damage in three years! I wonder how much debt they can rack up!
Posts: 1,924
Threads: 12
Joined: Feb 2009
Reputation:
0
Many ISP customers forget that very important point Peter has identified, that the fastest speeds are only as fast as the accessed server bandwidth is able to handle. Bottle necks are created when 100s of people access the same server at the same time. The big companies solve this problem by having multiple servers (i think, i'm not actually network trained, i'm a software person).
Posts: 9,473
Threads: 787
Joined: Sep 2006
Reputation:
0
My prediction is it will cost at least double of what they said. I.e. $86 billion! Maybe we should have a guess how much it will cost thread and then the winner will be selected in 8 or 16 years time!