I Don't Believe It?

[POWERZONE]

 

 

Heh Heh Proicless!

 

ALP is there for the party  and that is partly Union based.

 

Just ask thw AWU workers just how much the ALP supports them!

 

On the other hand the criminal CFMEU seem somewhat more supported.

Hmmmmmmmmmmm

 

Hmmmm - rampant wage theft in non unionised workplaces and we have sour grapes about unions ?

 

I put a higher proice in your first reply there mate

 

Still, welcome back from me as well

[Aloysius]

Amazing - yet another couple of instances of absolute inability to see any fault in Union leadership - but it's fact and it's out there.

 

Your clear subscription to the notion that "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" notion is noted and points to a clear class struggle mentality where none exists or needs exist -

Continual dwindling of non government employment unionised workers numbers says that people have already voted with their feet to dismiss your position.

In the real world folks act through self interest and the majority just don't agree with your defence of Union Leadership.

[POWERZONE]

Amazing - yet another couple of instances of absolute inability to see any fault in Union leadership - but it's fact and it's out there.

 

Your clear subscription to the notion that "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" notion is noted and points to a clear class struggle mentality where none exists or needs exist -

Continual dwindling of non government employment unionised workers numbers says that people have already voted with their feet to dismiss your position.

In the real world folks act through self interest and the majority just don't agree with your defence of Union Leadership.

 

It all comes down to relevance mate.  Union leadership issues are small beer compared to wage theft which is a global practice and has been for a decade or more. Continual dwindling of unionised workers = continual proven cases of workers being ripped off illegally by their employers. Your viewpoint of defending / deflecting employee theft by attacking unions is not shared by folks in the real world or even the law.

 

Of course it's a clear class struggle - it's a struggle between criminals who owe money and victims who are owed it.

 

I don't know any law abiding citizen apart from yourself that thinks that's a good thing.

 

mmmmmmm > https://youtu.be/1p-WDv2sLTw?t=124 

[Aloysius]

 

It all comes down to relevance mate.  Union leadership issues are small beer compared to wage theft which is a global practice and has been for a decade or more. Continual dwindling of unionised workers = continual proven cases of workers being ripped off illegally by their employers. Your viewpoint of defending / deflecting employee theft by attacking unions is not shared by folks in the real world or even the law.

 

Of course it's a clear class struggle - it's a struggle between criminals who owe money and victims who are owed it.

 

I don't know any law abiding citizen apart from yourself that thinks that's a good thing.

 

mmmmmmm > https://youtu.be/1p-WDv2sLTw?t=124 

 

 

Your interpretation of my post is somewhat flawed 

 

Not liking white does not mean liking black - if you get the idea!!

 

On the other hand your consistent refusal to accept any criticism of bad Union leadership is somewhat revealing - it exists and should be recognised.

 

The notion that some folks (employers) are all bad and that other gfolks ( Union Leaders) are all good is to say the least disingenuous.

 

Proven cases there are indeed of employer ripoffs - similarly there are significant proven cases of Union Leader crime - often against there own membership.

 

I'm an absolute supporter of the membership - just wish all leaders behaved as though they supported them too.

[POWERZONE]

"The notion that some folks (employers) are all bad and that other folks ( Union Leaders) are all good is to say the least disingenuous."

 

Of course it is. Who is making this notion? Not me.

 

I said union leadership issues are small beer compared to wage theft which is a global practice.

 

Small beer doesn't mean I'm claiming the glass is empty :beer:

 

Employer ripoffs are more dangerous because there's more of it and it's harder to detect :fishie: :fishie:

 

Another case reported just two days ago > https://www.sbs.com.au/yourlanguage/hind...-ombudsman

[POWERZONE]

Whoa! Powers' gone out in Adelaide again.

 

Bugger! We all know the power lines wouldn't come down if they were powered by coal :bee:

[POWERZONE]

I'll take the hydro thanks..

 


Nuclear is for the Rocket Man

[POWERZONE]

Closest NRL minor premiership race of all time they reckon...

 

   

 

yeah well they always were a sh!t team, but checking the table they could still mathematically make the 8

They got their wires crossed right?

[POWERZONE]

Which is more than we can say for Parramatta... they have thirteen weaks in their team. LOL

[POWERZONE]

AN ATHLETE has been banned from an all-you-can-eat sushi eatery after he ate almost 100 plates of fish.


I like this bit > "Mr Bobrowski, who works as a software engineer by day, follows an extreme diet where he does not eat for 20 hours and then eats “until I’m full,” - The “until I’m full” part is apparently what drove the restaurant to ban the athlete"

https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/food/e...33c266ee19


So he spends maybe 2 hours noshing / taking no prisoners and the other 18 making the S-Bend his best friend

[POWERZONE]

Actually I do believe it!


From Saturday Feb 16 Herald Sun.

D4281052-3860-4593-B749-7F29C288A62F.jpeg

 

Good call. I like that one

[POWERZONE]

Nope.

[radioholic]

Just when you think the Greens are going way away they come up with this. (In America).9FA390C6-0EB9-4A55-948C-4F389BC73BDC.png


See next post for the rest.

 

 

 

Im not a Greens fan  :ras:  :laugh:  :laugh:

[radioholic]

Do you believe this?


This article is from the April 8 issue of The Herald Sun Digital Edition. To subscribe, visit http://www.heraldsun.com.au/.



MATTHEW BENNS


AIR Force pilots are being told to think twice before bombing bridges in case this forces civilian women to walk further for water and firewood.


A “Gender in Air Operations” doctrine, introduced last year, orders RAAF personnel to consider actions through a “gender perspective” .


Its foreword by Air Commodore Stephen Edgeley, the director of general strategy and planning, says embracing a “gender perspective” will enhance operational capability.


An example is: “If the target is a bridge … this same bridge may also provide the only route for the local population to gather supplies such as water and firewood. Although destroying this target may provide a military advantage … the second-order effect may mean that, due to the gendered social roles, women need to travel further afield, on unfamiliar and less secure, well-known or well-lit routes to gather water and firewood” , leaving them at “an increased risk of sexual and gender-based violence” .


The doctrine is being policed by “gender advisers” , who accompany RAAF personnel into conflict zones.


The NSW president of the Australian Peacekeeper and Peacemaker Veterans Association , Bruce Relph, said top brass were trying to “make the buck stop with the pilot” .


He said: “This is going to make the pilot hesitate, afraid he might be charged with war crimes, and that puts his life in danger … the enemy will not be hesitating to shoot him down.”


Former soldier Bernard Gaynor said: “It seems the politically correct agenda has yet to reach peak insanity inside Defence. Pilots are now required to consider feminist theory before dropping bombs. Gender advisers are now deployed on operations,” he said.


“We need our defence force to train combat warriors, not social justice warriors.”


matthew.benns@news.com.au



Copyright © 2019 News Pty Limited

 

:blink:  :blink:

seriously!  

[radioholic]

So we all saw the national vegan protest. Check out what happened to this poor guy. 

 

 

An Australian grazier who runs a charity taking hay to drought-stricken farmers has revealed he has been inundated with phone calls from furious vegan protesters.

 

Farrell said that one woman phoned him and tried to claim that lettuces are alive. He said he answered every call because that's what I do – and the Sheila goes she didn't like the last post I done on Facebook because lettuces have got a heartbeat… Lettuce. Has. A. Heartbeat,' he said.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article...tbeat.html

[radioholic]

WTF,


I cannot take this PC shti anymore! This madness cannot be topped! I give up!


"Navy cannot march in the dark!


RITA PANAHI


SOMETHING is wrong when members of the Australian Navy are banned from marching in an Anzac Day dawn service owing to occupational health and safety concerns. What hope do they have of defending the country if the fear of “tripping in the dark” during a march has their superiors in a flap?


If a peaceful march to mark the sacrifice of their predecessors is too dangerous, how will they cope under fire or when called upon to neutralise hostile adversaries?


Mind you, the Australian Defence Force has no qualms about members marching in the Sydney Gay and Lesbian Mardi Gras parade, and shares footage of this on its official website. Last time I checked, the Mardi Gras parade is at night. So why is it that is worthy while a traditional Anzac Day dawn service is too risky? Just what kind of woke simpletons are making these calls on behalf of the men and women who have signed up to serve their country?


I first read about this madness in a little publication called the South Coast Register, which reported that “in a break with tradition … naval personnel won’t march at the Greenwell Point dawn service” .


“It is understood an occupational health and safety issue is the reason, with personnel not allowed to march in the dark due to safety concerns. One of the highlights of the dawn services at Greenwell Point is when current serving navy personnel join ex-Diggers in making the solemn 450 metre march from Greenwell Point’s main street to Anzac Park overlooking the Shoalhaven River.


“Massive crowds always greet the march at Anzac Park — at the Anzac commemorations in 2015, it was estimated 10,000 people surrounded the park to witness the event,” the report said.


The report went viral and soon senators and former ADF personnel wanted answers.


Senator Concetta Fierravanti-Wells tweeted: “Rita, @SenatorAbetz & I just asked questions about this! Details to be provided on notice but assurance given by (Chief of Navy Australia Michael Noonan) @CN_Australia that CO Albatross has come to an arrangement with RSL!” (HMAS Albatross is the naval air station).


The response from Defence only made it worse. A spokesman confirmed Navy personnel would not march, but would line up and wait for the march to arrive. “Safety was a factor in the decision not to march,” he said. “The instruction to HMAS Albatross personnel, while different to what may have occurred in the past, has been provided cognisant of procedures traditionally observed by service personnel attending dawn services, and the particular physical and environmental conditions expected at Greenwell Point on April 25, 2019.”


This revelation follows earlier media reports that ADF brass have ordered their underlings to consider “gender perspective” in everything they do. The insanity isn’t restricted to the Navy: the same woke dogma is being drilled into other ADF personnel, including RAAF pilots who are told to consider “Gender in Air Operations” . The Daily Telegraph revealed the doctrine’s foreword, by RAAF’s director of general strategy and planning, Stephen Edgeley, said embracing the “gender perspective” would enhance operational capability.


“If the military target is a bridge in a community that is being used as a main route by the enemy to transport weapons, this same bridge may also provide the only route for the local population to gather supplies such as water and firewood,” the doctrine says.


“Although destroying this target may provide a military advantage against the enemy, the secondorder effect may mean that, due to the gendered social roles, women need to travel further afield, on unfamiliar and less secure, wellknown or well-lit routes to gather water and firewood” , which could leave them at “an increased risk of sexual and gender-based violence” .


And last year we had ADF personnel encouraged to paint their fingernails pink to show their support for “equality” .


It’s only a matter of time before woke warriors rename the ADF. Not only is “Australian” exclusionary but “Force” suggests toxic masculinity. Even “defence” is problematic, as any gender studies academic will tell you.


Perhaps we should call it The Inclusive Diversity Circle. That’s sure to scare the enemy.


Our security is in good hands.


RITA PANAHI IS A HERALD SUN COLUMNIST.rita.panahi@news.com.au @ritapanahi



Copyright © 2019 News Pty Limited

 

 

Unfortunately thats how our sociality is becoming.  

Very sad indeed Anzac day was always a day to remember and honour those that have fought and service for a country.

It has always been tradition that all those military units join in slowly we seem to be loosing alot of traditions and rights. 

[POWERZONE]

Transacting $10,000 or more in cash could make you a criminal under proposed law

 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-08-20/t...l/11429230

 

Or to put it another way... "extraordinary penalty" for the use of legal tender.

 

And this is coming from a Govt purporting to be smaller with less interference and more personal freedom?

 

Nup :ph34r:

[Aloysius]

 

 

Unfortunately thats how our sociality is becoming.  

Very sad indeed Anzac day was always a day to remember and honour those that have fought and service for a country.

It has always been tradition that all those military units join in slowly we seem to be loosing alot of traditions and rights. 

 

 

OOps

[Aloysius]

Transacting $10,000 or more in cash could make you a criminal under proposed law

 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-08-20/t...l/11429230

 

Or to put it another way... "extraordinary penalty" for the use of legal tender.

 

And this is coming from a Govt purporting to be smaller with less interference and more personal freedom?

 

Nup :ph34r:

 

AS far as I know cash transactions in Q have been limited to less than $10k in the sense that any greater figure must be applied for in writing and advised to the government.

That was the case more than 20 years ago. I had to deposit $6k cash one day and $4k the next to avoid scrutiny.

 

And yes it was a legal transaction for some earthmoving parts.

[POWERZONE]

O' Well...

 

The Donald won't be buying Greenland with cash then