Quote:We have rising sea levels and rising temperatures

 

One of the doomful prophesies made in the 70's and 80's was the consequences of the hole in the ozone layer

 

A claim backed up by some scientific momma called Margaret Thatcher who became the key player for change.

 

Today it's almost completely re-sealed. So it's not all BS

 

 

For the proof seekers: I take the view the frog in hot water theory will play out but by then it'll be too late.

 

It's a bit like telling an 18 year old that smoking is bad for them

Quote:G'day Aloy.

 

I don't think even the most ardent climate skeptic supports this static mean theory you speak of.

 

Not even Andrew Bolt would agree with that.

 

The debate is about the cause - not the event.

 

If you want proof have a look at all those graphs you've posted.

 

They all show a rising trend of temperatures

Quote:Just bcause you don't think is not any kind of refutal of what someone says!


The only direct measure that appears to have any support from alarmists is the emission of CO2.


0.38% of atmospheric air is CO2 - easly verified!


FBD!

Quote:I guess we can cherry pick data but the whole debate is so mired in political mistruths it becomes difficult to form reasoned opinion.

Some alarmist power cells blanket ban any opinion but their own - so much for science and civil discourse.


Actual real climate scientists have varying views but the alarmists believe that their view is the only view.

In effect they are assuming godlike postures - how fitting since their alarmism is a matter of faith in models and predictions, a ridgy didge bonafide religion.


Of course they have the right to proselytise their faith but they don't have the right to deny others the same right.

But they do and fine fighters for democracy stand silently by.