09-04-2017, 01:40 PM
Oh no , no joke at all, I totally reject interference in a duly constituted arm of government, no matter who authored it, in this case the "supporters of workers rights"
Â
Just what part of our rule of law is safe from the whingers and political hacks?
Â
We could of course legally change the law - wanna revisit FWA?
Â
I doubt it - in that case support the rule of law.
Â
No worker will be safe if we water down these systems there will be no rules.
Â
The sheer arrogance of those who self proclaim their support for workers rights and thereby hint that they alone care.Â
This is demonstrably untrue, after all the AWU voluntarily negotiated away penalty rates during enterprise bargaining negotiations.
Â
Using your logic these self proclaimed protectors of "workers rights" are worse than the FWA, and both are worse than the government.
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Â
Compromised???? :Cry:Â :Cry:
Â
Just what part of our rule of law is safe from the whingers and political hacks?
Â
We could of course legally change the law - wanna revisit FWA?
Â
I doubt it - in that case support the rule of law.
Â
No worker will be safe if we water down these systems there will be no rules.
Â
The sheer arrogance of those who self proclaim their support for workers rights and thereby hint that they alone care.Â
This is demonstrably untrue, after all the AWU voluntarily negotiated away penalty rates during enterprise bargaining negotiations.
Â
Using your logic these self proclaimed protectors of "workers rights" are worse than the FWA, and both are worse than the government.
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Â
Compromised???? :Cry:Â :Cry:
Aloysius
Â
Y'all stay beautiful!!
Â
Y'all stay beautiful!!