03-08-2016, 07:10 PM
@Aloy. From your link...
Â
"Turnbullâs decision to deny Rudd the Australian Governmentâs support for his manic drive to become United Nations Secretary-General has seen him copping it from both sides of politics."
Â
OK so you say "Rudd is not a fit or proper person to be supported as head of the UN."
Â
You say so? That's fine with me.
Â
The electorate says so? Err no. The electorate weren't polled.
Using an OZ election result from 3 years ago isn't the same thing.
Â
The ALP says so? No. Read your link.
Â
As for "Rudd could never be trusted with top UN job" That's not fact as you portray it.
It's an opinion from a conservative radio and TV broadcaster :ras:<span style="font-size:12px;"><span style="font-size:14px;"> </span></span>
Â
Â
Â
I don't know mate. What part of that article are you not <span style="font-size:12px;"><span style="font-size:14px;">comprehending? </span></span>
Â
"Turnbullâs decision to deny Rudd the Australian Governmentâs support for his manic drive to become United Nations Secretary-General has seen him copping it from both sides of politics."
Â
OK so you say "Rudd is not a fit or proper person to be supported as head of the UN."
Â
You say so? That's fine with me.
Â
The electorate says so? Err no. The electorate weren't polled.
Using an OZ election result from 3 years ago isn't the same thing.
Â
The ALP says so? No. Read your link.
Â
As for "Rudd could never be trusted with top UN job" That's not fact as you portray it.
It's an opinion from a conservative radio and TV broadcaster :ras:<span style="font-size:12px;"><span style="font-size:14px;"> </span></span>
Â
Â
Â
Quote:Why is this so hard to comprehend?Â
I don't know mate. What part of that article are you not <span style="font-size:12px;"><span style="font-size:14px;">comprehending? </span></span>