03-08-2016, 11:25 AM
Well Peter, Shorten's role of dumping Kevin Rudd was because of 3 reasons
Shorten's role of dumping Julia Gillard was because of 3 reasons.
Shorten's role of dumping Tony Abbott was because of 3<sup>1</sup>â<sub>2</sub> reasons.
None of this makes Shorten a hypocrite; backstabber yes, effective opposition leader, yes. Hypocrite? No.
Â
Shorten has a habit of disappearing what is labeled as bad Prime Ministers.. Rudd, Gillard, Abbott and counting
Â
A hypocrite is someone who criticizes behaviour, then demonstrates it.
Â
Every criticism that was handed out by Tony Abbott in opposition was then repeated in Govt ad nauseum.
Â
While Tony Abbott might have been the worst ever PM he was definitely the best ever hypocrite.
Â
Â
Yes Aloy, I am seriously advising that I would not back Abbott for a UN leadership bid.
Â
Kevin Rudd at least had frequent and fair dialogue with other global leaders... think Kevin 747.
Â
Abbott on the other hand wanted to shirtfront the Russians and piss off the Indonesians.
Â
He was an international embarrassment.
Â
Arguably, Turnbull may be a better communicater than the other two but blocking Rudd's bid is nothing more than petty and vindictive and it only happened because the Libs were split 50/50 on the issue.
Â
It's a pisser really. Rudd had 50% Govt support for a UN bid yet Abbott only got about 30% for a PM role
Â
Â
That says it all I reckon. :dance:
- The ALP wanted to win the next election.
- The polls were going down because of Tony Abbott's "mining-taxi-scare" campaign. (Is that illegal Mal?)
- Julia Gillard wanted to steal the job.
Shorten's role of dumping Julia Gillard was because of 3 reasons.
- The ALP wanted to win the next election.
- The polls were going down because of Tony Abbott's "witchy-scare" campaign. (Is that illegal too Mal?)
- Kevin Rudd wanted to steal the job back.
Shorten's role of dumping Tony Abbott was because of 3<sup>1</sup>â<sub>2</sub> reasons.
- The Libs wanted to win the next election
- Abbott was a hypocrite who self inflicted his own demise with a little help from his Peta
- The polls were down because Abbott's dysfunctionality was almost as high as his ego.
- Abbott couldn't read an Electricity Bill
None of this makes Shorten a hypocrite; backstabber yes, effective opposition leader, yes. Hypocrite? No.
Â
Shorten has a habit of disappearing what is labeled as bad Prime Ministers.. Rudd, Gillard, Abbott and counting
Â
A hypocrite is someone who criticizes behaviour, then demonstrates it.
Â
Every criticism that was handed out by Tony Abbott in opposition was then repeated in Govt ad nauseum.
Â
While Tony Abbott might have been the worst ever PM he was definitely the best ever hypocrite.
Â
Â
Yes Aloy, I am seriously advising that I would not back Abbott for a UN leadership bid.
Â
Kevin Rudd at least had frequent and fair dialogue with other global leaders... think Kevin 747.
Â
Abbott on the other hand wanted to shirtfront the Russians and piss off the Indonesians.
Â
He was an international embarrassment.
Â
Arguably, Turnbull may be a better communicater than the other two but blocking Rudd's bid is nothing more than petty and vindictive and it only happened because the Libs were split 50/50 on the issue.
Â
It's a pisser really. Rudd had 50% Govt support for a UN bid yet Abbott only got about 30% for a PM role
Â
Â
That says it all I reckon. :dance: