30-09-2015, 11:44 AM
I could equally cite unions who have their workers confidence. You were right to say the ALP and Conservatives aren't all bad or all good, why not extend that to unions?
Of course not all employers are bad, but they are supposed to be regulated. Just like unions. Yet I've been aware of many other cases that are akin to the 7/11 case for many years, but while it's hard to monitor on an official level I reckon it's far more widespread than reported. I hope it gets investigated properly. Let's have a royal commission
Outmoded emotion says a lot about our obsession with union behaviour at the exclusion of everyone else.
Workchoices was anti worker because it took money off workers, that's an actuality.
Taking money off workers to reduce unemployment doesn't help workers, it helps non workers
Helping non workers is fine, as long as it doesn't punish workers in the process.
I'd rather see higher levels of employment achieved through tax incentives, such as cutting payroll tax or mind rooting BAS statements, not by cutting workers rights or shift allowances.
I'm yet to see how a Free Trade agreement with a communist nation is a good thing for workers? It reminds me of a failed Gillard policy of swapping 800 non processed asylum seekers with 4000 processed asylum seekers.
The ALP are right to question elements of it. For the record, it was only introduced to parliament a fortnight ago. So it's not as if the ALP have been constantly blocking it - that's just emotive language from the Govt. Let's see how good their negotiation skills are under the new leadership.
Howdy
Of course not all employers are bad, but they are supposed to be regulated. Just like unions. Yet I've been aware of many other cases that are akin to the 7/11 case for many years, but while it's hard to monitor on an official level I reckon it's far more widespread than reported. I hope it gets investigated properly. Let's have a royal commission
Outmoded emotion says a lot about our obsession with union behaviour at the exclusion of everyone else.
Workchoices was anti worker because it took money off workers, that's an actuality.
Taking money off workers to reduce unemployment doesn't help workers, it helps non workers
Helping non workers is fine, as long as it doesn't punish workers in the process.
I'd rather see higher levels of employment achieved through tax incentives, such as cutting payroll tax or mind rooting BAS statements, not by cutting workers rights or shift allowances.
I'm yet to see how a Free Trade agreement with a communist nation is a good thing for workers? It reminds me of a failed Gillard policy of swapping 800 non processed asylum seekers with 4000 processed asylum seekers.
The ALP are right to question elements of it. For the record, it was only introduced to parliament a fortnight ago. So it's not as if the ALP have been constantly blocking it - that's just emotive language from the Govt. Let's see how good their negotiation skills are under the new leadership.
Howdy