When They Tell You The Science Is In, It Never Is

[Aloysius]

Speaking of anecdotal:

 

http://insideclimatenews.org/news/290720...rung-later

 

 

We are besieged by pseudo scientific anecdotal evidence continually.

 

It's in the detail - changes over 100 years are magnified into fact.

 

yep I agree Mello - Anecdotal doesn't cut it 

 

As for less scientific evidence - well how about this:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/11763...mists.html

 

Two events last week brought yet further twists to one of the longest-running farces of our modern world. One was the revelation by the European Space Agency that in 2013 and 2014, after years when the volume of Arctic ice had been diminishing, it increased again by as much as 33 per cent. The other was that Canadian scientists studying the effect of climate change on Arctic ice from an icebreaker had to suspend their research, when their vessel was called to the aid of other ships trapped in the thickest summer ice seen in Hudson Bay for 20 years.

 

 

Or maybe this:

 

http://environmentalresearchweb.org/cws/...news/62032

The Antarctic is something of an anomaly in climate science. Unlike the Arctic, where the extent of summer sea ice has shrunk severely in recent years, the Antarctic has seen an average annual growth in sea ice of some 15,000 square km. And unlike its northern counterpart, for which a fall in sea ice has been largely consistent with climate-model predictions, the Antarctic’s behaviour has confounded climate modellers who have attempted to explain it.

 

The point here is that some are able to cite the warming Arctic but neglect to cite the cooling antarctic 

 

Is global warming a myth - should it be called "Northern Hemisphere warming" do they have more thermometers up there?