01-07-2019, 09:11 PM
I read that article in full - it's a can of worms.
Â
With the 2 jobs I work - both have a social media clause in the EBA that holds employees liable for their comments online.
Â
One of them goes back 10 years and people have been sacked since then.
Â
But this is different because it involves sponsors and then there's the religious freedom aspect as well.
Â
Â
45D highlights a gap in my knowledge of IR laws that cannot be tolerated. Bah!
Â
Suffice to say I thought it would've been abolished either in 1996 or 2006 by the Howard Govt.
Â
Workchoices effectively wiped the whole thing clean and set out 5 standards. Contrary to popular belief, the Rudd Govt didn't roll it back - they simply added more clauses and put then into the fair work act.
Â
That might work against the defense - but seriously, I dunno
Â
With the 2 jobs I work - both have a social media clause in the EBA that holds employees liable for their comments online.
Â
One of them goes back 10 years and people have been sacked since then.
Â
But this is different because it involves sponsors and then there's the religious freedom aspect as well.
Â
Â
45D highlights a gap in my knowledge of IR laws that cannot be tolerated. Bah!
Â
Suffice to say I thought it would've been abolished either in 1996 or 2006 by the Howard Govt.
Â
Workchoices effectively wiped the whole thing clean and set out 5 standards. Contrary to popular belief, the Rudd Govt didn't roll it back - they simply added more clauses and put then into the fair work act.
Â
That might work against the defense - but seriously, I dunno