27-06-2018, 02:13 PM
Hi Peter.
Â
You think we should be a dam nation?
Â
Why not? Tasmania is exactly that - 95% hydro and the rest is solar, wind, gas. 66 dollars per MW/h. Not bad.
Â
Victoria is 70% brown coal - 108 dollars per MW/h, then 15% hydro and gas - 140 dollars. Something funny there.
Â
Â
Yes, you need more energy to pump up the water than what you get from releasing it downward. No argument there.
Â
Solar can pump the water up - but only during the day - so running the solar to the grid would be a secondary function.
Â
I'm not across all the profiles or protocols they use but the priority for me is increasing the overall amount of available secure power.
Â
You think we should be a dam nation?
Â
Why not? Tasmania is exactly that - 95% hydro and the rest is solar, wind, gas. 66 dollars per MW/h. Not bad.
Â
Victoria is 70% brown coal - 108 dollars per MW/h, then 15% hydro and gas - 140 dollars. Something funny there.
Â
Â
Yes, you need more energy to pump up the water than what you get from releasing it downward. No argument there.
Â
Solar can pump the water up - but only during the day - so running the solar to the grid would be a secondary function.
Â
I'm not across all the profiles or protocols they use but the priority for me is increasing the overall amount of available secure power.